Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Henri Laaksonen vs Michael Agwi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - 06-29-24
By Wojtek Kolan - June 29, 2024
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Laaksonen vs Agwi analysis and find out who is favored!
Laaksonen VS Agwi PREDICTION Clay
M15 Wroclaw atp
29 Jun 2024 / Semifinals
Laaksonen Vs Agwi Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Henri Laaksonen takes on Michael Agwi in the atp M15 Wroclaw Men's Singles 2024 on June 29, 2024. Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Laaksonen Vs Agwi is now available here.
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Henri Laaksonen vs Michael Agwi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Laaksonen 0 - 0 Agwi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Laaksonen has won 45.1% of points on their second serve, while Agwi has won 49.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Laaksonen, in recent form, has won 51.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Agwi has won 51.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.5% and 37.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Laaksonen has saved 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Agwi has saved 63.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Laaksonen has won 39.13% of matches played (W/L 9/ 14), with Agwi winning 71.43% (W/L 50/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Laaksonen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 123/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11). Agwi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 11/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Laaksonen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 30% of matches (W/L 6/ 14), where as Agwi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.41% of matches (W/L 46/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Laaksonen has played against opponents with an average rank of 359.78 while Agwi has played against players with an average rank of 109.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Laaksonen has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Agwi has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Laaksonen has converted 52.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Agwi has converted 42.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
771
Rank
84
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
521
Rank
514
High
20
Age
Plays
Form
53% (446-389)
Career Total W/L
71% (79-33)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
79% (33-9)
$1,218,340
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
3
Current Event Stats To Check Player Form & Enhance Prediction Accuracy
M15 Wroclaw
Clay| stats | Henri Laaksonen | Michael Agwi |
|---|---|---|
| Total Matches | 3 | 3 |
| Last Match | 3:34:00 | 1:19:00 |
| Total Time | 6:33:00 | 5:01:00 |
| Aces Pg | 0.26 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 18 |
| DFs Per Game | 0.29 | 0.83 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 24 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (128/240) | 50% (95/189) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (88/128) | 86% (82/95) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (56/112) | 49% (46/94) |
| Total BPs Won% | 63% (12/19) | 53% (9/17) |
| Total BPs Saved | 75% (24/32) | 85% (11/13) |
| Service Hold (%) | 76% (26/34) | 93% (27/29) |
| Opp Hold (%) | 65% (22/34) | 69% (20/29) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (98/236) | 41% (70/170) |
| Total Pts Won | 51% (242/476) | 55% (198/359) |
| Tiebreak W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Per Match | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Laaksonen Vs Agwi Prediction: Who Wins?
TennisTipster88 : After in-depth analysis of past career performance, current form, and the head-to-head matches of Henri Laaksonen and Michael Agwi, we give Laaksonen a 49.21% chance of winning and Agwi 50.79% chance of victory. Our prediction: Agwi wins. If you want to bet on this match it's very important you take the best odds available into consideration as it is the odds value relative to the probability of the outcome that is important. Check out our today's tennis predictions page for full value bet analysis of this and all WTA, ATP and ITF tennis matches!
The Best Odds For Henri Laaksonen vs Michael Agwi For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Laaksonen VS Agwi
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Henri Laaksonen | Michael Agwi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 81% (17/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 71% (35/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (46/55) | 58% (263/194) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 96 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 20 | 93 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:1 | 1:50:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 312 | 71.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (185/338) | 58% (836/1431) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (123/185) | 72% (606/836) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (69/153) | 48% (283/595) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (12/23) | 43% (83/193) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (123/332) | 45% (696/1560) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 81% (17/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 86% (6/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (16/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (16/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Henri Laaksonen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Karol Drzewiecki
57%
(
75 of
131)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
117)
5
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
43%
(
24 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
42%
(
55 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
46 of
117)
122
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(7) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Maciej Rajski
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
50
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Henri Laaksonen
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Henri Laaksonen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Laaksonen
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Henri Laaksonen
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Henri Laaksonen
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
112
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Goncalo Falcao
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Henri Laaksonen
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Agwi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Arthur Bonnaud
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Bruno Kokot
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Filip Pieczonka
46%
(
42 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
9
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Michael Agwi
49%
(
47 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Michael Agwi
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Michael Agwi
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
John Sperle
60%
(
56 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Louis Tessa
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
113)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Karlo Cubelic
48%
(
48 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
99)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
45%
(
24 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Michael Agwi
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-0 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Laaksonen Vs Agwi Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Laaksonen are available here and Agwi photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Henri Laaksonen
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Michael Agwi
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
